[pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:19:13 -0700
At 01:32 PM 10/30/2004, Richard Knoppow wrote:
>The ratio of the diagonals is about 3.9. This is the factor
>to multiply a 35mm lens by to get the equivalent 4x5 focal
>length or to devide the 4x5 lens by to get the equivalent
>35mm FL.
And thanks to you too Richard.
:-)
Jim
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Gene Johnson
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Richard Knoppow
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Gene Johnson
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Richard Knoppow