Adrienne Moumin wrote: > I don't get it......privatized or not, if you're physically standing on > public property you have the right to take a photo of anything you dang well > please...at least in the US. A "security guard" is a contracted employee, > not an officer of the law (once again, in the US anyhow). > > Last time I checked, it's not against the law to photograph private property > if you're standing on public lands while doing so. Slanderous, libelous, or > other non-fair-use employment of the image is another story, however. > > When this has happened to me (and it has, by both business owners and hired > security guards), I tell them I am within my rights to take pictures, as I > am standing on public property. I also mention that they are within their > rights to call the police, which they NEVER do. After all, the time spent > calling police (who will likely refuse to come for such a non-crime) on > someone who will be gone in moments anyhow is a no-brainer. I stand my > ground, and they eventually are forced to go back to their business if they > want to continue earning income, and avoid the bad PR because I tend to be > LOUD when my civil liberties are being infringed upon. > > I know my approach isn't for everyone...just sharing my experiences, in the > hope it will inspire others to stand up for their rights as well! Hurray for freedom and those willing to fight for it! Leigh ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.