[pure-silver] Re: Depth of Field (35mm vs. 4x5 or 8x10)
- From: Barrie Bunning <barrieb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:03:15 +1000
Greetings ;
If we take 50 mm as being the 'Standard lens for 35mm ' then 100mm is
double that length:
If we take 150mm as being the Standard lens for 4"x5"' then 300mm is double
that length:
I believe we should compare 'Focal lengths' NOT Film area.
Cheers Barrie B.
At 10:48 AM 30/10/2004, you wrote:
>At 04:36 PM 10/29/2004, Gene Johnson wrote:
>
>
> >1600mm? You sure about that Jim? I was thinking more like 400. He used a
> >100mm on his 35mm camera
>
>
>The 4x5 frame is roughly 16x the 35mm frame. This is all about image
>magnification. 16x 100 = 1600.
>
>But I could be wrong and would gladly accept another proof.
>
>Jim
>
>=============================================================================================================
>To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
barrieb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx{ Melbourne , Australia }
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
