[projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
- From: David Davis <feline1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:22:49 +0100
I *think* that's a an exact summery, yes.
I vote for option 2. :)
--
http://www.feline1.co.uk
On Fri 24/06/11 8:28 AM , Timothy Pederick pederick@xxxxxxxxx sent:
I'm seeing a fair bit of (what appears to me to be) arguing at
cross-purposes. Since people said last time that my summary of the
situation was helpful, I shall venture to do another one. This time, I'll
just lay out the arguments that I think have been seriously proposed as
people's preferred way of playing.
* The "Joe Dever got it wrong" argument.
* All bonuses for having Grand Weaponmastery with Bow should be +5.
* All instances of +3 (and that one _ad hoc_ +4) should be changed.
* The "Grand Weaponmastery is intentionally worse" argument.
* The Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
* _Ad hoc_ +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
* +3 and +4 are worse than a loyal reader's +5, so the loyal reader gets
to use their +5 at all times.
* The "Grand Weaponmastery is the same as Weaponmastery" argument.
* Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
* _Ad hoc_ +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
* A loyal reader who got the Mentora +2 (which is a subtly different
bonus) can add that to Grand Weaponmastery, giving them a +5 (or _ad hoc_
+6 or +7).
Correct?
--
Tim Pederick
Other related posts:
