On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22/02/2013 03:22, Jonathan Blake wrote: >> >> Thanks for checking these, Simon. Why would they be errata here and >> non-errata in the next two books? > > The NO books don't contain a complete collection of "Improved Disciplines", > only the ones relevant to the maximum level you can have in any given book. > So when the phrase occurs in #27 and #28 it's because we're adding the text > by collecting together the material from the previous books. Of course. I lost sight of which section we were talking about. OK, I'll work on that today. I'll be going forward with publication today (I hope) unless anyone has a solid reason to put the brakes on. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon