Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Jared Wright <wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:07:16 -0500
If you poke around you can most usually find XP drivers for these
laptops that ship with Vista. I've had plenty of luck with at least
Acers, Asus, HP, and Dell amongst others. And you really just need to do
a detailed hardware scan or check online and figure out the exact
components and get drivers from the manufacturers of the components
rather than the folks who bundled it all together. Just clarifying that
with a little hunting most of the time you can still put Windows XP on
whatever new laptop you may wish to buy, provided you have a standalone
Windows XP license to use. I don't blame you guys that don't want to
use Microsoft's latest effort on a daily basis. But sadly if you want
something preinstalled with Windows XP you're probably not going to get
the most computer for the money at this point. Of course there're parts
of the world where the economics might indicate different trends, but I
digress.
JW
black ares wrote:
let me tell you a story,
I bought a laptop this days, but all manufacturers asociate with
Microsoft and offer their laptops with freedos and with drivers only
for vista.
The manufacturers which don't want to asociate with Microsoft offer
their laptops with linux, but their can not offer drivers for windows
at all.
So I had to search a lot until I found a laptop which still support
windows xp.
I choose a hp compaq 6730s
----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita"
<orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
Well, I use Jaws 6, because the newer versions have issues, and this
version of Jaws didn't want to work with the latest driver for my
video card.
The solution was to install a previous version of the driver for the
same video card, and Jaws works very well with it.
So there are solutions sometimes.
(But I hope I won't need to change very soon the hardware I use now.)
Octavian
----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares"
<matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
for example because the pc vendors force you to do this?
How?
By not providing to their new components xp drivers.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita"
<orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
And in this case, why upgrading to Vista? Just because it might have
a nicer interface for the sighted which is completely unuseful for me?
As I said, I will upgrade only if MS will stop supporting XP,
because the security updates are really important.
Octavian
----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares"
<matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
try to answer your self at this question, where you've seen ever a
newer
windows consuming less sresources than previous versions?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita"
<orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
Does that version consume less resources than Win XP?
Octavian
----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares"
<matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
for the vista there is a better alternative named windows server
2008
which is vista with out content protection and for this reason
working
with 18% better than vista.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita"
<orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
Well I guess those millions of users of Vista are those who use a
cracked version, and that's why their number doesn't show
anywhere. :-)
I think I will never use Vista. Or just like XP, I will use it,
if the
next version of Windows will consume more resources than Vista
and MS
won't support XP.
Octavian
----- Original Message ----- From: "tribble" <lauraeaves@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <blind-windows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <program-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"bprogramming" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Science,
Technology,
Mathematics, SCI-FI, and more." <sci-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:40 PM
Subject: Fw: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
Hey all -- What is your take on the following?
--le
----- Original Message -----
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:01:21 -0800
From: John Oram <norami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: LifeRaft <survpc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: LifeRaft <survpc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/windows_vista_no_longer_matters.html
October 26, 2008 7:15 PM
Windows Vista No Longer Matters
News Commentary. Did it ever?
Make no mistake: Microsoft has moved beyond Windows Vista,
which will
become
all too apparent during this week's Professional Developer
Conference.
Windows
7 is the future, and in many ways it's the present, too.
Contrary to ridiculous assertions recently made by Microsoft
CEO Steve
Ballmer,
Windows Vista is a flop. If businesses aren't buying Vista, after
waiting
six
(now seven) years, it's no success. Yet, during the last day of
the
Gartner
2008 expo 10 days ago, Steve asserted that Vista "has been
extremely
successful."
A few days earlier, Steve boasted: "Vista is our best-selling
product
ever.
So,
if that takes too much getting over—we're not going to have
products
that
are
much more successful than Vista has been. We sold over 180 million
copies in
the first 18 months, quite successful." Really?
But who's buying this "best-selling" product ever? "We have 180
million
users,
mostly on the consumer market," Steve said in an Oct. 2 speech.
Oh?
According
to Gartner analysts Neil MacDonald and David Smith, only about 10
percent of
enterprises have adopted Windows Vista. That's not a high number,
particularly
in context of the approximately six years between Windows XP
and Vista.
It's not surprising then that PDC attendees will hear whole
lots about
Windows
7 this week and very little about its predecessor. Windows 7
banners
are
plentiful enough, as are the sessions: Out of 194, 22 are
dedicated to
Seven
and none to Windows Vista. It has leprosy, baby, and nobody
wants to
catch
it.
I Googled "PDC 2008," and one of the pages—not now available—is
"Unveiling
Windows 7 to the World."
Vista is headed to as quick a death as Microsoft can give it.
Someday
soon,
some gun-toting Microsoft executive will lead Vista out back
and "Pop!"
Netbook
buying trends and the sagging economy give Microsoft more
reasons to
want to
off Vista as soon as humanly possible. The signs are everywhere:
The vanishing license count. Every quarterly earnings since
Vista's
release,
Microsoft executives counted up the number of licenses shipped.
There
was
near
silence during last week's 2009 fiscal first-quarter earnings
announcement.
The
number was 180 million three months earlier. It's now "What?"
Microsoft's
failure to toot "the number of Vista licenses" horn means
something.
Maybe
the
increase wasn't that great, or maybe Microsoft is moving beyond
Vista.
I say
yes to both.
Windows client income down. During the fiscal first quarter, the
division's
revenue grew a paltry 2 percent year over year, but income
decreased by
4
percent. Microsoft has no tough year-ago comparison to account
for the
weak
results. By comparison, Business division revenue and income
were up 20
percent
and 23 percent, respectively. Microsoft attributed year-over-year
Windows
client income declines to sales of lower-cost versions in emerging
markets
and
on netbooks in mature markets. Considering that PC shipment
growth was
still
strong during the quarter, Windows results forebodes Vista
weakness.
Increasing netbook sales. The product category is pure trouble for
Microsoft
because Windows Vista demands too much to adequately run on the
hardware. So
netbooks typically either ship with Linux or Windows XP Home. That
netbook
buyers would be satisfied with 7-year-old consumer XP is just
about the
only
commentary necessary to understand Vista's market plight.
According to
Microsoft, netbooks added 8 percent growth to otherwise flat
U.S. PC
sales
during the third calendar quarter. The category is hot, but
Vista is
not and
couldn't be. Seven had better run well on netbooks and soon.
"Windows. Life Without Walls." The marketing campaign should be
called
"Windows. Life Without Vista." If Vista is so successful, as Steve
claims,
then
why isn't Microsoft advertising the software? Rather, Microsoft is
trying to
get away from Vista, abandoning a brand that it already
invested tens
of
millions of dollars promoting. Its absent role at PDC says it all.
There are plenty of other signs:
Continued OEM sales of XP downgrade licenses
The aforementioned 10 percent enterprise adoption
Apple's Mac market share gains (35 percent in U.S. retail revenue)
Microsoft is moving beyond Vista to Windows 7. Windows Vista no
longer
matters.
If it did:
Enterprises would be buying it
Consumers would be demanding it
Microsoft wouldn't freak out about Apple's "Get a Mac" ads
The hottest new computer category, netbooks, would ship with Vista
Microsoft would be aggressively advertising Vista, instead of
trying to
bury
the brand
Developers would be creating hunky Vista apps; instead,
projects like
Yahoo
Messenger for Windows Vista are being abandoned
I've long said that Windows Vista isn't a bad operating system.
It's
just
not
particularly better than Windows XP. Strange, then, that Microsoft
isn't
messaging Seven as being particularly better than Windows
Vista. It
won't
be.
Microsoft believes, with some justification, that Vista has major
perception
problems. The company clearly has decided that negative
perceptions
can't be
fixed. Hence, the diminished emphasis on Vista; starting
tomorrow—and
especially on Tuesday—an increased emphasis on Windows 7. By
shifting
emphasis
to Seven, Microsoft is treating Vista perceptions mainly as a
marketing
problem.
Vista deserved better market reception than it got. Strange, a few
small
improvements could have changed everything—like startup times.
Everybody
bitches about how long Vista takes to boot up or wake up from
sleep.
Last
week,
one of my longtime Windows buddies bought a MacBook. Yesterday we
talked
about
startup times. He surprised me. He had already clocked startup
times: 7
minutes
on his Vista notebook and about a minute for the $1,299
MacBook. That's
not
scientific, but it needn't be. One user, one experience
multiplied by
180
million Vista licenses is scientific enough.
[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at gmail.com].
Posted by Joe Wilcox on October 26, 2008 7:15 PM
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Chris Hallsworth
- References:
- Fw: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: tribble
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
Other related posts:
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » RE: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » RE: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- » Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
let me tell you a story,I bought a laptop this days, but all manufacturers asociate with Microsoft and offer their laptops with freedos and with drivers only for vista. The manufacturers which don't want to asociate with Microsoft offer their laptops with linux, but their can not offer drivers for windows at all. So I had to search a lot until I found a laptop which still support windows xp.
I choose a hp compaq 6730s----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:53 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
Well, I use Jaws 6, because the newer versions have issues, and this version of Jaws didn't want to work with the latest driver for my video card. The solution was to install a previous version of the driver for the same video card, and Jaws works very well with it.So there are solutions sometimes. (But I hope I won't need to change very soon the hardware I use now.) Octavian----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares" <matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:02 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)for example because the pc vendors force you to do this? How? By not providing to their new components xp drivers.----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:27 AM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)And in this case, why upgrading to Vista? Just because it might have a nicer interface for the sighted which is completely unuseful for me?As I said, I will upgrade only if MS will stop supporting XP, because the security updates are really important.Octavian----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares" <matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:55 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)try to answer your self at this question, where you've seen ever a newerwindows consuming less sresources than previous versions?----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:26 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Does that version consume less resources than Win XP? Octavian----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares" <matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:45 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)for the vista there is a better alternative named windows server 2008 which is vista with out content protection and for this reason workingwith 18% better than vista.----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:58 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Well I guess those millions of users of Vista are those who use acracked version, and that's why their number doesn't show anywhere. :-)I think I will never use Vista. Or just like XP, I will use it, if the next version of Windows will consume more resources than Vista and MSwon't support XP. Octavian ----- Original Message ----- From: "tribble" <lauraeaves@xxxxxxxxx> To: <blind-windows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <program-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;"bprogramming" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Science, Technology,Mathematics, SCI-FI, and more." <sci-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:40 PM Subject: Fw: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Hey all -- What is your take on the following? --le ----- Original Message ----- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:01:21 -0800 From: John Oram <norami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: LifeRaft <survpc@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: LifeRaft <survpc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Mattershttp://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/windows_vista_no_longer_matters.htmlOctober 26, 2008 7:15 PM Windows Vista No Longer Matters News Commentary. Did it ever?Make no mistake: Microsoft has moved beyond Windows Vista, which willbecomeall too apparent during this week's Professional Developer Conference.Windows 7 is the future, and in many ways it's the present, too.Contrary to ridiculous assertions recently made by Microsoft CEO SteveBallmer, Windows Vista is a flop. If businesses aren't buying Vista, after waiting six(now seven) years, it's no success. Yet, during the last day of theGartner2008 expo 10 days ago, Steve asserted that Vista "has been extremelysuccessful."A few days earlier, Steve boasted: "Vista is our best-selling productever. So,if that takes too much getting over—we're not going to have productsthat are much more successful than Vista has been. We sold over 180 million copies in the first 18 months, quite successful." Really?But who's buying this "best-selling" product ever? "We have 180 millionusers,mostly on the consumer market," Steve said in an Oct. 2 speech. Oh?According to Gartner analysts Neil MacDonald and David Smith, only about 10 percent of enterprises have adopted Windows Vista. That's not a high number, particularlyin context of the approximately six years between Windows XP and Vista.It's not surprising then that PDC attendees will hear whole lots aboutWindows7 this week and very little about its predecessor. Windows 7 bannersareplentiful enough, as are the sessions: Out of 194, 22 are dedicated toSevenand none to Windows Vista. It has leprosy, baby, and nobody wants tocatch it. I Googled "PDC 2008," and one of the pages—not now available—is "Unveiling Windows 7 to the World."Vista is headed to as quick a death as Microsoft can give it. Somedaysoon,some gun-toting Microsoft executive will lead Vista out back and "Pop!"Netbookbuying trends and the sagging economy give Microsoft more reasons towant to off Vista as soon as humanly possible. The signs are everywhere:The vanishing license count. Every quarterly earnings since Vista'srelease,Microsoft executives counted up the number of licenses shipped. Therewas near silence during last week's 2009 fiscal first-quarter earnings announcement. The number was 180 million three months earlier. It's now "What?" Microsoft'sfailure to toot "the number of Vista licenses" horn means something.Maybe theincrease wasn't that great, or maybe Microsoft is moving beyond Vista.I say yes to both. Windows client income down. During the fiscal first quarter, the division'srevenue grew a paltry 2 percent year over year, but income decreased by4percent. Microsoft has no tough year-ago comparison to account for theweakresults. By comparison, Business division revenue and income were up 20percent and 23 percent, respectively. Microsoft attributed year-over-year Windows client income declines to sales of lower-cost versions in emerging markets andon netbooks in mature markets. Considering that PC shipment growth wasstillstrong during the quarter, Windows results forebodes Vista weakness.Increasing netbook sales. The product category is pure trouble for Microsoft because Windows Vista demands too much to adequately run on the hardware. So netbooks typically either ship with Linux or Windows XP Home. That netbookbuyers would be satisfied with 7-year-old consumer XP is just about theonlycommentary necessary to understand Vista's market plight. According to Microsoft, netbooks added 8 percent growth to otherwise flat U.S. PCsalesduring the third calendar quarter. The category is hot, but Vista isnot and couldn't be. Seven had better run well on netbooks and soon."Windows. Life Without Walls." The marketing campaign should be called"Windows. Life Without Vista." If Vista is so successful, as Steve claims, then why isn't Microsoft advertising the software? Rather, Microsoft is trying toget away from Vista, abandoning a brand that it already invested tensof millions of dollars promoting. Its absent role at PDC says it all. There are plenty of other signs: Continued OEM sales of XP downgrade licenses The aforementioned 10 percent enterprise adoption Apple's Mac market share gains (35 percent in U.S. retail revenue)Microsoft is moving beyond Vista to Windows 7. Windows Vista no longermatters. If it did: Enterprises would be buying it Consumers would be demanding it Microsoft wouldn't freak out about Apple's "Get a Mac" ads The hottest new computer category, netbooks, would ship with VistaMicrosoft would be aggressively advertising Vista, instead of trying tobury the brandDevelopers would be creating hunky Vista apps; instead, projects likeYahoo Messenger for Windows Vista are being abandonedI've long said that Windows Vista isn't a bad operating system. It'sjust not particularly better than Windows XP. Strange, then, that Microsoft isn'tmessaging Seven as being particularly better than Windows Vista. Itwon't be. Microsoft believes, with some justification, that Vista has major perceptionproblems. The company clearly has decided that negative perceptionscan't befixed. Hence, the diminished emphasis on Vista; starting tomorrow—and especially on Tuesday—an increased emphasis on Windows 7. By shiftingemphasisto Seven, Microsoft is treating Vista perceptions mainly as a marketingproblem. Vista deserved better market reception than it got. Strange, a few small improvements could have changed everything—like startup times. Everybodybitches about how long Vista takes to boot up or wake up from sleep.Last week, one of my longtime Windows buddies bought a MacBook. Yesterday we talked aboutstartup times. He surprised me. He had already clocked startup times: 7minuteson his Vista notebook and about a minute for the $1,299 MacBook. That'snotscientific, but it needn't be. One user, one experience multiplied by180 million Vista licenses is scientific enough. [Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at gmail.com]. Posted by Joe Wilcox on October 26, 2008 7:15 PM __________ View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________View the list's information and change your settings at http://www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Chris Hallsworth
- Fw: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: tribble
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
- From: black ares