Re: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
- From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:30:47 -0200
Just make sure you don't end up having to manage 50 pointless RACs... ;)
Alan.-
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Goulet, Richard <Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> Hemant,
>
> That is quite true, but once you've voiced your concerns and
> objections (as someone else recently pointed out) your off the hook.
>
>
> Dick Goulet
> Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
> PAREXEL International
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:51 AM
> To: Goulet, Richard
> Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
>
>
>
> Sometimes being politically correct can mean being professionally
> lacking. Lacking in management's duty to protecting shareholders (or
> citizen's) money.
>
> At 10:35 PM Monday, Goulet, Richard wrote:
> > Maybe the best argument for RAC is politics. .... It just makes
> > your boss feel more secure.
> >
> >
> >Dick Goulet
> >Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
> >PAREXEL International
> >
>
>
> Hemant K Chitale
>
> http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
Other related posts:
