RE: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
- From: "Goulet, Richard" <Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Guillermo Alan Bort" <cicciuxdba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:10:34 -0500
Ouch, please not so hard!!
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
PAREXEL International
________________________________
From: alanbort@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:alanbort@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Guillermo Alan Bort
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:31 AM
To: Goulet, Richard
Cc: Hemant K Chitale; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
Just make sure you don't end up having to manage 50 pointless RACs... ;)
Alan.-
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Goulet, Richard
<Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hemant,
That is quite true, but once you've voiced your concerns
and
objections (as someone else recently pointed out) your off the
hook.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
PAREXEL International
-----Original Message-----
From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:51 AM
To: Goulet, Richard
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
Sometimes being politically correct can mean being
professionally
lacking. Lacking in management's duty to protecting
shareholders (or
citizen's) money.
At 10:35 PM Monday, Goulet, Richard wrote:
> Maybe the best argument for RAC is politics. .... It just
makes
> your boss feel more secure.
>
>
>Dick Goulet
>Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
>PAREXEL International
>
Hemant K Chitale
http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
