[opendtv] Re: Panasonic's AG-HVX200
- From: Mark Schubin <tvmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:28:41 -0400
>Thanks again Mark. This has always been a bit confusing to me. I
>suspect that the situation has been amplified a bit as my eyes have
>aged and I have been forced to use reading glasses and seek brighter
>light in order to read "the fine print."
>
>What it seems to boil down to is the contrast ratio of the detail
>that one wants to perceive. In your grating examples the contrast
>ratio keeps getting lower as the the level of detail increases.
>
>While you properly point out that there are many contributing
>factors, I believe that one of the major issues is the need to
>properly filter images to obey the laws of physics and sampling
>theory. For video imagery we cannot allow unfiltered transitions from
>black to white, as is common with the non-Nyquist limited samples
>you are looking at as you read this message. So while the text on
>this page may have a black sample next to a white sample, in a video
>image we need to ramp from black to white - through grey - or to
>limit the contrast of the transition.
>
>At the lower frequencies of the grating there is good contrast
>because the peak intensity of the samples reaches full white and full
>black. There are grey samples in between, but the frequency of the
>detail is low enough to be represented faithfully. As the frequency
>of the detail increases, however, we reach a point where the
>intensity of the stimulus can no longer be represented with full
>black or white samples. Filtering becomes a factor causing the
>samples to be limited in contrast as the frequency increases, until
>we reach the point where the grating becomes a grey blob. Obviously
>filtering is not the only contributing factor. Most cameras employ
>optical filtering, and the lens itself limits what the sensor can
>"see." Hence, the MTF curve does a good job of predicting the
>relationship of the original stimulus to the intensity of the
>stimulus that we see in the sampled image. More area under the curve
>is another way of saying that a system can pass full contrast
>transitions at higher frequencies, thus enhancing our ability to
>perceive higher levels of detail.
>
>And then there is the reality that the display ALSO has an MTF curve,
>and that it can impact the ability to perceive detail based on the
>contrast, brightness and sharpness controls. Joe Kane makes his
>living in this space, teaching people how to control ambient light
>and adjust a display so as to maximize perceived contrast and detail.
>
>Does all of this make sense Mark?
>
>
Except for the part about the Nyquist filtering (and I'm not sure Kane's
work is relevant). That belongs in a different discussion.
Here's a URL to a contrast sensitivity function grating:
http://tinyurl.com/avgda
Everyone should see an upside-down U-shaped curve at the top, but
there's none in the picture. We're just less sensitive to low contrast
at both low and high spatial frequencies. If you look at the grating
from farther away, the position and shape of the curve will change.
So the eye is least sensitive to low contrast ratios at high spatial
frequencies, but lenses and sampled imagers also deliver the least
contrast ratio at high spatial frequencies. That's why Consumer Reports
could state that, at normal viewing distances, the best ED plasma they
tested looked no worse than the HDs when fed HD.
TTFN,
Mark
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
