[oagitm] Re: Microsoft License Agreement

  • From: Randy Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "davidcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <davidcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Pat.Hartley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Pat.Hartley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:38:24 -0800

I concur. Once you let your maintenance go you have to repurchase the licenses. 
It's going to be much better in the long run to keep up with it. 

Also, do you really want to let IT upgrade policy be set by how much money your 
agency feels it has right then? I inherited an organization like that. We had 
every version of Office and Windows that had been released in the last ten 
years. It may save money on the front end, but supporting a heterogeneous 
network is way more expensive in the end. True savings in support comes from 
standardization.

Did I mention that when you do decide to upgrade you have to buy all those 
licenses again? Those who are only doing pay as you go do not have the same 
business case you do. You have already invested in all those licenses and are 
only paying maintenance. You will lose that by terminating the EA.

*R*


Randy Paul
Information Technology Director
Klamath County Oregon
316 Main Street, Room 20
Klamath Falls, OR 97601
541-883-5142






-----Original Message-----
From: oagitm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oagitm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Cummings, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:29 PM
To: Pat.Hartley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [oagitm] Re: Microsoft License Agreement

All I can say is that true up down the road is a killer, and you eventually 
will want to true up. To do this is robbing Peter to pay Paul. I would only do 
this as a last resort.

 

Just my 2 cents.

 

Dave

 

From: oagitm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oagitm-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Hartley, Pat
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:10 PM
To: oagitm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [oagitm] Microsoft License Agreement

 

Folks,

 

As we here at the City are looking at a rather bleak next few years, I am 
considering every line item for potential reduction... I think y'all have been 
there at one point or another.

 

Among one of our biggest yearly ticket items is our Microsoft License 
Agreement.  I am considering dropping it and going to a pay as I go model.

 

Still running the numbers to see if that works, but was wondering if anyone 
else on the list has done this and what challenges they saw.

 

Any and all feedback is very appreciated.

 

~Pat

 

Patrick H. Hartley

---------------------------------------------

Technology Director

City of Gresham Oregon

W 503.618.2520

M 971.678.7631 

pat.hartley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Visit us online at GreshamOregon.gov <http://greshamoregon.gov/> 

 

________________________________

NOTE: This message was trained as non-spam. If this is wrong, please correct 
the training as soon as possible. 
Spam <about:blank> 
Not spam <about:blank> 
Forget previous vote <about:blank> 

Other related posts: