Seems like this might have some namespace clashes already: https://github.com/paulbellamy/mango http://code.google.com/p/mango-doc/ Not sure if those are still active, just a cursory search... Maybe go-span or gospan, Go Scalability Protocols And Nanomsg library? Naming things is sometimes the hardest part... Kevin On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > On April 21, 2014 at 12:50:32 AM, Martin Sustrik (sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx) > wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 21/04/14 08:39, Alex Elsayed wrote: > > Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > > >> I did some more work to SP for go. (Still haven’t renamed it > >> yet, mostly because I’ve not settled on a name.) > > > > Maybe it could be gospel :P > > > > Go Scalability Protocols - Extensible Logic (or some similar > > backronym) > > Haha. > > +1 > > > Cute idea, but I don’t really like it — too much association with religion > (regardless of how I feel about such matters). > > Late last night I came up with “mango”, which sort of breaks the > association with nanomsg at some level, but feels more like a natural name > for a project to stand up in is own right. The other proposals on the > table at present are “nngo”, and “nango”. > > nango is clearest from any sort of confusion, and keeps the intent clear. > (It also paves the way for others — jango for a Jave implementation, rango > for a ruby implementation? Not sure what conflicts there are in *those* > names.) > > “mango” exists already in the form of medical imaging software written in > Java. It seems unlikely for confusion to exist. But people finding > “mango” when looking for nanomsg … harder. > > Btw, could also have “mangos” (which is not correct spelling of the plural > in English), whih would have the odd feature of using *all* of the > characters in nanomsg and only those characters (although the “n” is only > used once). Kind of a cool name I think. > > Any other opinions? > > - Garrett > >