[nanomsg] Re: more updates
- From: Kevin Baker <kbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, garrett@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:28:30 -0500
Seems like this might have some namespace clashes already:
https://github.com/paulbellamy/mango
http://code.google.com/p/mango-doc/
Not sure if those are still active, just a cursory search...
Maybe go-span or gospan, Go Scalability Protocols And Nanomsg library?
Naming things is sometimes the hardest part...
Kevin
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> On April 21, 2014 at 12:50:32 AM, Martin Sustrik (sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx)
> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 21/04/14 08:39, Alex Elsayed wrote:
> > Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >
> >> I did some more work to SP for go. (Still haven’t renamed it
> >> yet, mostly because I’ve not settled on a name.)
> >
> > Maybe it could be gospel :P
> >
> > Go Scalability Protocols - Extensible Logic (or some similar
> > backronym)
>
> Haha.
>
> +1
>
>
> Cute idea, but I don’t really like it — too much association with religion
> (regardless of how I feel about such matters).
>
> Late last night I came up with “mango”, which sort of breaks the
> association with nanomsg at some level, but feels more like a natural name
> for a project to stand up in is own right. The other proposals on the
> table at present are “nngo”, and “nango”.
>
> nango is clearest from any sort of confusion, and keeps the intent clear.
> (It also paves the way for others — jango for a Jave implementation, rango
> for a ruby implementation? Not sure what conflicts there are in *those*
> names.)
>
> “mango” exists already in the form of medical imaging software written in
> Java. It seems unlikely for confusion to exist. But people finding
> “mango” when looking for nanomsg … harder.
>
> Btw, could also have “mangos” (which is not correct spelling of the plural
> in English), whih would have the odd feature of using *all* of the
> characters in nanomsg and only those characters (although the “n” is only
> used once). Kind of a cool name I think.
>
> Any other opinions?
>
> - Garrett
>
>
Other related posts:
