[nanomsg] Re: more updates
- From: Gonzalo Diethelm <gonzalo.diethelm@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:59:11 -0300
Garrett, I am following your work with much interest, although I won't have
a chance to use it in the near future. Please keep up the good work!
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Garrett D'Amore <
garrett.damore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For those following (is anyone doing so?) my Go implementation, I've added
> BUS (fixing it to conform to the nanomsg semantics), and renamed my earlier
> pattern to STAR. I'm probably going to rework the STAR a bit -- already
> I've changed it so that the resend occurs at the "cooked" (not raw) level,
> so XSTAR doesn't resend.
>
> STAR/XSTAR users *must* be careful to avoid creating loops as this will
> currently cause infinite message duplication/looping. I'm going to fix
> that soon by adding a max hop count and some additional protections. I
> might also add some spanning tree logic to attempt to eliminate message
> duplication altogether.
>
> Also, I've added pipeline (PUSH/PULL) pattern support. The only pattern
> that my implementation doesn't support yet is SURVEYOR/RESPONDER. I'll
> probably add that over the next day or so.
>
> I expect to add the Device() API shortly too.
>
> If anyone is using this stuff (or planning to) please let me know. Also,
> I'm "borrowing" this list for these notifications -- I hope folks don't
> mind, even though this isn't technically "nanomsg" but an alternate (and
> hopefully compatible!) implementation. (Martin, if you want me to take
> these announcements elsewhere, just let me know.)
>
> --
> Garrett D'Amore
> Sent with Airmail
>
--
Gonzalo Diethelm
gonzalo.diethelm@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
