[nanomsg] Re: more updates
- From: zerotacg <zero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 16:08:28 +0200
On 27.04.2014 04:46, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> 2. There may be other transports that use TLS on top of … (notably
> probably *not* DTLS, but one could imagine TLS on top of IPC, etc. Not
> sure what value that would have, but I *can* think of actual use cases.)
wouldn't it make sense to make it an socket option and make it available
for all transports?
Other related posts:
