>MB: So, maybe Paul (and others who have no 'faith' in religion or god[s], >etc.) simply has not met the 'right god', yet? Or maybe Paul just wants to be a bachelor of religions. >PE: Or being in love. But few people would insist that their beloved make >clear >why they are in love as a condition of love. Perhaps it has something to do >with the nature of the question? I could list 20 things about WHY I am enamoured with something/someone. I don't know if I could go so far as to describe what love is, but I'm very sure that I've been "in love", several times and I could probably fairly well describe what it felt like and I definitely know WHY it waned. I also certainly know what it is "to love" on an ongoing basis (totally different than being 'in love' I think) and I COULD definitely describe why I love the people I do. But I couldn't do that with religion, because I've NEVER been religious. No, that's not quite true. I truly believed IN God with all my heart for about 30 minutes one night, but it wasn't a religious thing. Alas, that flickered and died in a matter of days. And I know why THAT waned too. How about if I rephrase the question: "will anyone try to put their finger on why they CHOSE (and it IS most surely a choice) to have faith in their particular religion?" And, if you disagree with me that it's a choice, can you define the genesis (no pun intended) of 'finding' religion? I'm guessing I'm just too unwilling to compromise to believe in anything without a valid reason... man, religion really IS like a relationship! Maybe I'm just damaged goods in the faith department. all too rational and jaded, paul ########## Paul Stone pas@xxxxxxxx Kingsville, ON, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html