[lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:51:41 +0000
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 2:26:34 PM, Eric Yost wrote:
EY> Then you come up with this ludicrous statement about "if
EY> someone's going to commit a war crime against you, etc." which
EY> essentially excuses Saddam's invasion and looting of Kuwait.
No it doesn't. Try reading it in context.
EY> What are you arguing against? Gulf War I? Do you believe Saddam
EY> should have kept Kuwait? Was it just a knee-jerk reaction or do
EY> you have a more substantial position to offer than posting
EY> Godwin's Law? That's why your question doesn't make sense.
My first post argues that all war crimes are war crimes, not only
those committed by the defeated nation/s.
My second post is a reaction to your knee-jerk reaction, "Saddam did
worse".
--
Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
mailto:judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit