[lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:36:09 -0500
Citation of the level of Iraqi conscripts from a British reporter:
A British correspondent, Stephen Sackur, happened to come across
the remains of an Iraqi convoy that had "panicked, seizing any
vehicle that looked capable of taking them to Iraq before the
Allies could close in." The scale of the American attack on this
helpless convoy appalled him:
Was it necessary to bomb the entire convoy? What threat
could these pathetic remnants of Saddam Hussein's beaten army
have posed? Wasn't it obvious that the people of the convoy would
have given themselves up willingly without the application of
such ferocious weaponry? The hundreds who, by some miracle, did
survive were duly taken prisoner. They included *two women* and a
*child*
Who were these Iraqis killed in their hundreds, burnt beyond
recognition on the Mutla Ridge? It's a fair bet that most of them
were nothing more than conscripts—regarded by Saddam Hussein as
expendable.[51]
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/3019
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit