[lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:24:30 -0500
JW:
To make another metaphor, one that's intended as metaphor, not as
biologically determinative, maybe "Culture" (with a capital C) is like
DNA.
Oh goody!!! A metaphor fight! Here's mine: culture is a recipe for
cooking-up a life. "Cooking-up" is, of course a metaphor for dealing with
the ingredients at hand. The "ingredients at hand" is a metaphor for
something like -- (1) all the values imbued in you by your loving or
unloving parents -- it makes a difference in how bitter the meal the dish
turns out, as Irene will testify -- as well as by all your preachers and
teachers and Mrs. Grundy; (2) your weird neighbors; (3) your own particular
physical and psychological needs; and (5) social circumstances. Most of us
tend to not trust ourselves enough to throw out the recipe and start from
scratch. The ingredients are there -- that's all we really have to work
with. OK, then, we go with the comfort food meal. But occasionally someone
will come along with some strange ingredient and add that in. And that
changes the whole taste of life. Those who like it, repeat it, those who
don't either kill those who change the recipe or learn to live with the
difference. Ergo Baskin-Robbins.
Mike Geary
Memphis
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Wager" <john.wager1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 9:44 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
The difficulty with the spaceship analogy is there aren't any other
spaceships around, and we can only be in one at a time. But we're never in
just one culture; we breathe in many cultures all the time. No one may
escape "culture" but NONE of us is trapped inside a single culture,
anywhere.
To make another metaphor, one that's intended as metaphor, not as
biologically determinative, maybe "Culture" (with a capital C) is like
DNA. We all swim in it; our own is usually pretty stable, but we are
porous to other forms. We can transfer some of our genes into other
creatures, and those creatures transform some of their DNA into us. But
DNA is NOT the same as a particular species; it's the common bond of all
species. "Culture" is the common bond of all people, even though specific
sets of DNA seem to look like they are only present in a particular place
and time. Species="a" culture; DNA="Culture." We live both in "a" culture
and "Culture."
Torgeir Fjeld wrote:
Mike Geary commented:
How does that happen if we are nothing more than our culture? How
does an individual ever begin to stand outside her culture and act
contrary to it, even subversive to it if we are nothing more than
our culture -- which is a tenet or mine, btw.
let's say we're on a spaceship travelling through outer space. while we
fly around there are engineers working on the spaceship, repairing and
improving, as it were. that's culture andcultural change --
perhaps there is an element of negation to repairing?
-tor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Geary"
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:09:26 -0500
DW:
>>Regarding culture, I remain unconvinced, to be polite, that
anyone stands outside of culture. I have as liitle respect for
the most agreeable Humanist that merely regurgitates the ideas of
his guru as I do for the autocrat that is capable of not a whit
less.<<
I agree with this totally, wholly and completely. But
then cultures do change, don't they? How does that happen if we
are nothing more than our culture? How does an individual ever
begin to stand outside her culture and act contrary to it, even
subversive to it if we are nothing more than our culture -- which
is a tenet or mine, btw. This is a question that has long plagued
me. Cultures, of course, are never monolithic. They are
invariably composed of disparate peoples with disparate needs
thrown together through historical events. But, given time, out
of that disparateness comes a way of living together which I would
call a culture. And I think this coming-together can and must
happen planetarily -- I like the term "planetarily", but that's
probably just my homeboy culture -- if we people types hope to
progress into the next millennium. Mike Geary
Universe
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: John McCreery
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: Torgeir Fjeld
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: John Wager
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- » [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
Torgeir Fjeld wrote:
Mike Geary commented: How does that happen if we are nothing more than our culture? How does an individual ever begin to stand outside her culture and act contrary to it, even subversive to it if we are nothing more than our culture -- which is a tenet or mine, btw.let's say we're on a spaceship travelling through outer space. while we fly around there are engineers working on the spaceship, repairing and improving, as it were. that's culture andcultural change -- perhaps there is an element of negation to repairing?-tor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Geary" To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:09:26 -0500 DW: >>Regarding culture, I remain unconvinced, to be polite, that anyone stands outside of culture. I have as liitle respect for the most agreeable Humanist that merely regurgitates the ideas of his guru as I do for the autocrat that is capable of not a whit less.<< I agree with this totally, wholly and completely. But then cultures do change, don't they? How does that happen if we are nothing more than our culture? How does an individual ever begin to stand outside her culture and act contrary to it, even subversive to it if we are nothing more than our culture -- which is a tenet or mine, btw. This is a question that has long plagued me. Cultures, of course, are never monolithic. They are invariably composed of disparate peoples with disparate needs thrown together through historical events. But, given time, out of that disparateness comes a way of living together which I would call a culture. And I think this coming-together can and must happen planetarily -- I like the term "planetarily", but that's probably just my homeboy culture -- if we people types hope to progress into the next millennium. Mike Geary Universe
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: Torgeir Fjeld
- [lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: John Wager