[lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: wokshevs@xxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:18:07 -0230
I respectfully submit that first, it is not possible to "waft" between two
notions, statements, women, religions, traffic lanes, etc.. To waft is not to
waver. Second (or secondly, I never knew which) Eric's "(2)" is noteworthy for
a number of reasons; its intelligibiity not being one of them. (The effect of
reading too many sociobiological texts, no doubt.)
Wafting along ... singing a song ... (C#)
Walter O.
By the Cliffs of the Avalon
(and in the midst of many cruise-shipped American tourists)
Quoting Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>Eric asks ... is there such a thing as "belief" without the content
> of the belief?
>
> Robert counterquestions: "For example?"
>
>
> When I wrote the question, I was wobbling and wafting between two
> notions of belief:
>
> (1) that it requires content (to which Donal added that it also required
> an attitude toward that content); and
>
> (2) that the word "belief" may signify the operation of some biological
> cognitive or mental facility which unifies the actions and functioning
> of a human being irrespective of the particular content of the belief.
>
> Concern 1 might be the province of philosophy and concern 2 the province
> of cognitive scientists. Can they be combined?
>
> Air-conditioned,
> Eric
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
