Judy Evans wrote: > Friday, May 13, 2005, 12:23:06 AM, Robert Paul wrote: > > RP> Judy Evans wrote: >>>RP> Just what you'd expect a Canadian to say. However, scrap paper, although >>>RP> it can be jotted on (q.v.) is paper meant for scrap. >>>No it is not! It is scrap paper! Then she wrote: > RP> I'm not sure how this gets us any forwarder. > I also think this gets us forwarder. Let us retrace this argument. One may sketch it thus: A: Scrap paper is meant for scrap. B: No, it isn't. It is scrap paper! Now, an impartial observer, C, might think that B had merely repeated, with emphasis, what A had initially said, without explaining the meaning of 'scrap paper.' That a thing is identical with itself is perhaps news in Wales, but I suspect that deeper issues are lurking here. Robert Paul Coming down with hives, somewhere West of Lake Oswego ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html