[lit-ideas] Re: Fukuyama and Danto

  • From: Eric <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:17:20 -0500

So there is a respectable intellectual tradition behind all these topoi. But still, there could be other prognostications-cum-theories, with their fashionable "End of" strategies like:

The End of Cooking: As global modalities overtake restaurateurs and domestic chefs alike, cuisines will cease to compete, and we'll see more and more fusion restaurants.

The End of Dancing: The is no more progression of "in" dances. One may partake of ballroom, frug, moonwalk, hopak, barn dance, cake walk, disco, mambo, jitterbug, or pas de quatre because there is no "master terpsichore" with which to engage. Pluralism reigns.

The End of Endings: Every eschatology has been dominant in its time, including End of Days, Heat Death of Entropy, Nietzschean Riverrun, Return of the Enlightened Superaliens. No one view of finality may be said to supersede others, and a grand plurality of endings, allows to finish where we see....


Endlessly posting, Eri








________
Has anyone considered that Fukuyama was simply piggybacking his title (if not his total concept) from Arthur C. Danto's popular and hugely influential essay, from the mid-80s, called THE END OF ART?


As Fukuyama does eight years later, Danto reprises a Hegelian thesis. Danto means the "end of art" to be the end of so-called "master narratives" in art

As F says of history (ahem..8 years later) Danto maintains that art will continue, but the defining characteristics that allow art to extinguish their competitors, and create stylistic "progress" have disappeared from art, that art has no special way to be received.

For Danto, after linear progress in artistic styles has been overthrown, anything goes and pluralism reigns. Fukuyama (ahem...8 years later) says that the dialectics that define civilizations will disappear and capitalist pluralism will reign.

So maybe Fukuyama was at a cocktail party somewhere and overheard an aesthetics professor or artist describing Danto's essay (and later, book) and thought...."Hmmm, maybe I can make a name for myself by applying this same schtick to history?"

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: