OK>> Fukuyama in 1989. interpreted both Hegel and Kojeve to > be saying that history would end in liberal democracy > (not capitalism). I'm not sure this is a rebuttal of my post. (I add that F would appear to have misunderstood both Hegel and Kojeve.) In accordance with the idealist > approach, he talks consistently about "liberal idea" > rather than modes of production. He considers the > Marxist reading of Hegel to be a distortion. As I said, I was talking about *Kojeve*. Judy Evans, Cardiff ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html