Fukuyama says he got it from Marx, who (he also notes) lifted it from Hegel. Danto was on his own admission also influenced by Hegel. Well, I guess Eric caught them now. O.K. --- Eric <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > _The End of History_ > > Has anyone considered that Fukuyama was simply > piggybacking his title (if not his total concept) > from Arthur C. Danto's popular and hugely > influential essay, from the mid-80s, called THE > END OF ART? > > As Fukuyama does eight years later, Danto reprises > a Hegelian thesis. Danto means the "end of art" to > be the end of so-called "master narratives" in art > > As F says of history (ahem..8 years later) Danto > maintains that art will continue, but the defining > characteristics that allow art to extinguish their > competitors, and create stylistic "progress" have > disappeared from art, that art has no special way > to be received. > > For Danto, after linear progress in artistic > styles has been overthrown, anything goes and > pluralism reigns. Fukuyama (ahem...8 years later) > says that the dialectics that define civilizations > will disappear and capitalist pluralism will reign. > > So maybe Fukuyama was at a cocktail party > somewhere and overheard an aesthetics professor or > artist describing Danto's essay (and later, book) > and thought...."Hmmm, maybe I can make a name for > myself by applying this same schtick to history?" > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html