[lit-ideas] Fukuyama and Danto
- From: Eric <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:57:27 -0500
_The End of History_
Has anyone considered that Fukuyama was simply
piggybacking his title (if not his total concept)
from Arthur C. Danto's popular and hugely
influential essay, from the mid-80s, called THE
END OF ART?
As Fukuyama does eight years later, Danto reprises
a Hegelian thesis. Danto means the "end of art" to
be the end of so-called "master narratives" in art
As F says of history (ahem..8 years later) Danto
maintains that art will continue, but the defining
characteristics that allow art to extinguish their
competitors, and create stylistic "progress" have
disappeared from art, that art has no special way
to be received.
For Danto, after linear progress in artistic
styles has been overthrown, anything goes and
pluralism reigns. Fukuyama (ahem...8 years later)
says that the dialectics that define civilizations
will disappear and capitalist pluralism will reign.
So maybe Fukuyama was at a cocktail party
somewhere and overheard an aesthetics professor or
artist describing Danto's essay (and later, book)
and thought...."Hmmm, maybe I can make a name for
myself by applying this same schtick to history?"
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
