Robert Paul answers: >I think that MG means that philosophy cannot _pace_ Bentham, help us >understand our lives at the level of pleasant sensations and smiley faces. That >is, even if philosophy could help us understand our lives (or show us why we >can't) it would do so at a more interesting level than this. This was surely the >Socratic program. And if MG does mean this, I'd agree. At what level and how >philosophy does help us understand our lives, I have no idea: I don't really >understand what's meant by understanding one's life, as a broadly conceived >enterprise--no idea what would count as having understood my life, e.g. And (for >me), where the answer does not exist, the question does not exist. A.A. For an illustration that understanding one's life is a question/s with answer/s, I refer once again to the movie I saw last night, House of Sand and Fog. In that movie, the motives of the Colonel were transparent. The Deputy Sheriff's actions were, by contrast, bizarre but very imaginable. He and the lead character (actress Jennifer Connolley) would have done well to examine their motives. As to whether philosophy would have helped, I read somewhere that Russell Bertrand was depressed to where he was contemplating ending his life. Then while walking on a beach he began to consider life, and it gave him enough purpose, shall we say, to keep going. Andy Amago ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html