You're implying (at the very least) that language creates ideas. Is that a fair assessment? If the tribe which does not have a word for the colors red and green, but only "dark", were confronted with 3 red apples and 1 green apple in a row on the table and asked which of the apples were different -- are you telling me they would see no visual difference? Julie Krueger On 10/15/07, Andreas Ramos <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> John -- if you didn't have a word for "red" would you still see the > >> colour > >> of an apple, a tomato, blood? Or, because you didn't have the word for > >> it, > >> would your brain simply stop processing data? > > There are a few tribes that don't have names for colors. They distinguish > colors in two groups: bright or dark. Red is dark. Green is dark. To them, > red and green are the same "color", or better said, they are both dark. > > So they don't "have a word" for the color red and don't see red. They see > dark. > > This isn't an odd idea. It happens in our world all the time. > > If I show (for example, Julie) a long page of computer code, she only sees > random characters (many of which are misspelled), lots of "<" and ">", and > so on. Her brain sees alphabetical characters, but not the meaning. To me, > I > see the structure of the code and what it does. Julie doesn't have "a word > for it" (actually, she probably does have a word for it, but it's not a > polite word) and "can't see" it. > > yrs, > andreas > www.andreas.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >