John -- if you didn't have a word for "red" would you still see the colour of an apple, a tomato, blood? Or, because you didn't have the word for it,would your brain simply stop processing data?
There are a few tribes that don't have names for colors. They distinguish colors in two groups: bright or dark. Red is dark. Green is dark. To them, red and green are the same "color", or better said, they are both dark.
So they don't "have a word" for the color red and don't see red. They see dark.
This isn't an odd idea. It happens in our world all the time.If I show (for example, Julie) a long page of computer code, she only sees random characters (many of which are misspelled), lots of "<" and ">", and so on. Her brain sees alphabetical characters, but not the meaning. To me, I see the structure of the code and what it does. Julie doesn't have "a word for it" (actually, she probably does have a word for it, but it's not a polite word) and "can't see" it.
yrs, andreas www.andreas.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html