[lit-ideas] Re: Big Pharma's competition

  • From: Brian <cabrian@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:22:53 -0500

On May 10, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Andy Amago wrote:

>> [Original Message]
>> From: Brian <cabrian@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 5/10/2005 8:50:42 AM
>> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Big Pharma's competition
>>
>>
>>>
>>> A.A.   Big Government is bigger since Bush.  Government shrank under
>>> Clinton, as did the deficit.  The deficit grew enormously, if not
>>> astronomically, from surplus to extreme debt.  What relic are you
>>> talking
>>> about?
>>>
>>
>> It is definitely bigger under Bush, a big-government conservative.
>> I'm talking about the post-New Deal explosion in federal spending.
>>
>>
>
>
> A.A. How does that translate to reality?

It translates into exponentially higher federal spending.  Hence big  
government, as opposed to small government before that.  Do you  
really not understand that concept?

>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A.A. What in your opinion is a free society?  Free to do what?
>>>
>>
>> I don't understand your question.  America, for most of its history,
>> has been a free society.
>>
>>
>
>
> A.A. In other words, you're using words you don't understand.

I understand freedom.  I still, however, don't understand your  
question since freedom is a common enough word and you want a  
definition of it.  Do you not know what a free society as opposed to  
a totalitarian society is?

>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A.A.  How would society be improved without Social Security?
>>>
>>
>> Society is improved anytime people are allowed to keep their own
>> money to do with as they see fit.  Unless you are James Michener who
>> believes that governments he's lived under have distributed his money
>> far better than he could.
>>
>>
>
>
> A.A. Great sounding platitude.

Thank you.

>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A.A. Wow, do you have your facts screwed up. The ultra rich pay no
>>> taxes or
>>> next to no taxes at all, let alone 80%.  The middle class shoulders
>>> the
>>> entire tax burden of this country.  Kindly supply sources for your
>>> 20/80
>>> figures.
>>>
>>
>> http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/57xx/doc5746/Report.pdf
>>
>>
>
>
> A.A. Raw undistilled facts mean nothing at all.  Even members of  
> Congress
> have no idea how outdated and ineffective the tax code is.  Try the  
> book
> Perfectly Legal, by David Cay Johnston.

What a typical dodge when presented with the facts.  As long as book  
recommendations are being proffered I suggest Hayek's ROAD TO SERFDOM.

>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>> A.A.   Given how filled your post is with misinformation, you are
>>> clearly
>>> from the factually challenged masses.  Are you religious too?
>>>
>>
>> What misinformation?
>>
>>
>
>
> A.A.  Everything you said is a baseless opinion.  For example, that  
> 20% of
> Americans pay 80% of the taxes.  That is pure fantasy.  That we  
> import high
> paying jobs.  That China is a slave labor economy.  You're kidding,  
> right?
> That we're a "free society" yet you define free by telling us it's  
> always
> been that way.

You really are silly and pathetic when cornered with the facts.

~Brian~
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: