[lit-ideas] Re: A Question REALLY Answered

  • From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:28:38 -0500

I don't have specific details, and the word untrainable is not mine.  I either 
read or heard it.  I don't think for a minute that it has anything to do with 
I.Q. or hand-eye coordination.  From what I can gather, they're untrainable 
because there's such a mish mosh of factions, extreme criminality, they're 
infiltrated left and right with insurgents and so on.  There simply is no such 
entity as the Iraqi People to train.  In addition, Americans are hated and 
anyone who cooperates with Americans has retribution visited upon them.  
There's too much chaos from which to create an army.  Likewise the police force 
is a joke from everything I've read/heard.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: david ritchie 
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 12/26/2005 2:05:56 PM 
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: A Question REALLY Answered




On Dec 25, 2005, at 10:35 PM, Andreas Ramos wrote:


Specifically, he meant their lack of experience. The officer said that he had 
"not met one, not one, Iraqi who knew how to use a scope". They simply don't 
understand how to use weapons, act as an army, act as a team, and so on.


I wonder about the Iraq/Iran War. Did they just simply slaughter each other in 
the most primitive way?


"Andy" adds, "Iraqi soldiers are in fact not trainable in the sense that the 
American Army is trainable.  "


May I call your attention to the following website


http://www.iranchamber.com/history/iran_iraq_war/iran_iraq_war3.php


which repeats, in different form, the claim that both Iraq and Iran's forces 
were unable to use scopes (the ref here is to tank scopes).  And yet, you'll 
note, the air war was fought in sophisticated fashion.  


You'll see that the infantry slaughter was very primitive, particularly once 
the Iranians put Mullahs in charge of military operations.


Is "Andy" saying that those people who choose to join Iraq's new armed forces 
are different from their American counterparts in some way: I.Q. or hand-eye 
co-ordination or willingness to listen and to be subject to military 
discipline?  What makes them "untrainable"?  

David Ritchie
Portland, Oregon

Other related posts: