[LRflex] Re: a 4/3 sensor to match the 36mm size?
- From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:44:39 -0800
Split mirror???? Part swings up and part swings down? Or part folds under
the part that flips up? Has that ever been tried????
> -----Original Message-----
> From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 3:57 PM
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: a 4/3 sensor to match the 36mm size?
>
> Dave Saalsaa <dsaalsaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The only problem is the mirror size with a larger than full 24 x 36
> mm
> > format. Clearance with the rear element is an issue... mirror
> clearance
> > is the issue as I see it and the larger the mirror the slower the
> max.
> > shutter speeds.
>
> This is a significant issue and from an engineer's perspective I'd like
> to
> see how this problem is solved if the format of the R9 replacement is
> any
> larger than 24mm x 36mm... assuming the camera incorporates a
> traditional
> mirror box.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on
> Microsoft®
> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1167 - Release Date:
> 12/3/2007 12:20 PM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1167 - Release Date: 12/3/2007
12:20 PM
Other related posts:
