Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING

  • From: "Dave Durber" <d.durber@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:30:53 -0400

Back in the 1980's, I remember a friend using a piece of equipment, called 
"Frank AudioData"

It was a full size keyboard with built-in speech.  It had two sliders.

One slider, ran along the top of the keyboard which moved the AudioData's 
cursor left and right across the line.  It used tones to indicate space 
characters and other characters as you moved the slider.

The vertical slider ran down the left side of the keyboard and was used to move 
the AudioData's cursor up and down by a line.  As you moved the slider down the 
screen, it used ascending tones.  As you moved the slider up the screen it used 
descending tones.

On top of the two sliders, there was a button which you press to move the 
PC/application cursor to the location of the AudioData's cursor.

In addition, there were volume and pitch controls.  There may have been a 
control for increasing and decreasing the speed of the voice, but I cannot 
remember if there was or was not.

Sincerely:

Dave durber

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob W 
  To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:35 PM
  Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING


  Yeah, I remember those beauties. You had speech from the moment you turned 
the power on. 
  They weren't very versatile but they were quite a work horse.
  Don't remember what they were called.
  I always wished someone would build something like that for pcs. 

  Bob

  "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed 
by those who are dumber." Aristotle 
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: George Marshall 
    To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:39 AM
    Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING


    Tom:
    I am surprised IBM didn't give you one of there terminals with speech. I 
also programmed on IBM 360,370 and 9000's. I think about 1982 IBM developed a 
terminal with speech, had a numeric like pad attached with a cord used to 
control reading of the screen.
    George R. Marshall
    marshall.geoma4@xxxxxxxxx
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Tom Lange 
      To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:51 PM
      Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING


      Hi,
      I wish I'd known about JAWS back in the Eighties, it might have made life 
easier for me in some respects.  I did mainframe programming for IBM from 1978 
to 1994 in a VM environment, programming using the APL programming language up 
until around 1987 or so.  After that I programmed using Rexx, which was very 
English-like.  

      I didn't know about screen reading solutions for the PC until 1994, so 
all through that time I was at IBM, I used an Optacon to read the screen.  That 
was actually pretty cool, if a bit inefficient.

      Tom

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Bob W 
        To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:20 AM
        Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING


        Hi Prakash.

        I am retired now, but was a mainframe programmer from the early 
seventies to the late 1990s. I used jaws from the early 80s to my retirement. I 
don't think I could have done programming without it.

        What you are proposing--going from a visual programmer to a nonvisual 
programmer--is a daunting, but not impossible, challenge.

        I suspect that you do not know Braille. Knowledge of Braille and an 
80-cell display would be a great tool to have in your arsenal. You don't need 
to learn literary Braille, or even grade two Braille (though this might be 
helpful. But, I would suggest that you emphasize learning computer Braille, 
which in some ways is superior to literary Braille.

        As I said earlier, your challenges may seem daunting, but they can also 
be fun, and they may enhance your creativity.

        Good luck, and when you run into problems, this list is a great place 
to seek answers.

        Bob




        A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that 
thing you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams  

          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: john.falter 
          To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
          Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:04 PM
          Subject: Re: JFW/PROGRAMMING


          I programmed in assembly language and Cobol for 8 years using JAWS..

            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: PRAKASH P 
            To: JFW@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
            Cc: PRAKASH P 
            Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:42 AM
            Subject: JFW/PROGRAMMING


            I HAVE RECENTLY  COME TO A POINT WHERE I CANNOT DO ANYTHING 
VISUALLY ON THE COMPUTER SCREEN. 

            I HAVE BEEN USING zOOMtEXT AUDIO  EFFECTIVELY UNTIL NOW. But now I 
am told JFW  is the way to go. 



            Can someone give  me a good  view/opinion of how 
effective/efficient would it b to do programming for a living with or without 
JFW. 



            I have 20 years of programming experience with MS environments 
being the  latest.  I am able to read all ctooll tip  based text  and the 
program text itself  but  not sure if I can  compete with 

            The visually   enhanced set.  I know I have much learning to do but 
I would like  a seasoned person to give  a sense of whats possible. 

            I am a good learner if not a speedy one. 



            I am trying to  figure out if I should or should not give up on 
serious implementation responsibilities. 



            Thanks for any and all  input  I can get. 



            Prakash







            Prakash



            This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of 
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or 
privileged.

            If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this 
email in error, 

            (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,

            (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete 
this email and all attachments,

            (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or 
responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.


            For other languages, go to 
http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer 

Other related posts: