Re: JFW or JFW Pro

  • From: "Danny Wells" <dd-wells@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:23:39 -0400

They tried, but I dug in my heels.  In short they eventually compensated with 
gift certificates after I told them they were no better than Gateway, but I 
still have XP Pro and have to use the more expensive versionof JFW.  I learned 
to make sure the sales person is listening when I purchase anything by phone 
now.  if this is off topic I apologise.  I hope I don't sound like I am wining 
and complaining.  I made a mistake by not making sure the sales person was 
listening, and I learned a lesson, (1 mistake better cake).

Danny


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Peter 
  To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 2:14 PM
  Subject: Re: JFW or JFW Pro


  A bit off topic but did they charge you for the XP Pro? If not, under normal 
circumstances I'd be chuffed to bits with that outcome except for having to buy 
JAWS Pro.

  Peter



  From: Danny Wells 
  Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 6:50 PM
  To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Subject: Re: JFW or JFW Pro



  I bought a computer from Dell.  I ordered XP and received XP Pro.  Dell would 
not acknowledge and correct the mistake, so I ended up having to buy the jFW 
Pro version.  What can I say except We live in a post modern and post Christian 
world; consequently, its ethics, or the lack thereof, (HoHum). 

  Danny 

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Gary King 
    To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 1:18 PM
    Subject: Re: JFW or JFW Pro


    Peter,

    Freedom Scientific has always had a standard and a pro version of JAWS, and 
the only difference has been, and still is, in the authorization.  For the pro 
authorization and for an SMA you have to pay more.

    I've never heard that FS has tried to justify this marketing strategy 
publicly, and really they don't need to as long as it works for them.  They 
calculate that businesses who hire JAWS users and vocational rehab agencies who 
purchase JAWS for clients who are going into employment will pay the higher 
cost for the pro version of JAWS.  GW Micro once had 2 versions of Window-Eyes, 
but they now have only one version that works with all versions of XP and 
Vista.  Of course, the lower priced version of Window-Eyes was the one that 
disappeared from the market.  However, Window-Eyes still sells for less than 
the pro version of JAWS.  I haven't checked lately to find out the cost of 
upgrading from the standard version of JAWS to the pro version, but I'm sure 
it's cheaper than changing screen readers.  So, if you want the additional 
functionality that comes with Vista Business or Vista Ultimate, you will just 
have to bite the bullet and pay the price.

    Gary King
    w4wkz@xxxxxxxx

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Peter 
      To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 8:11 AM
      Subject: JFW or JFW Pro


      Could someone tell me why we need to use JAWS pro for Vista business, 
Ultimate etc.

      The funtionality is no different in the way JAWS works with it or the 
features other than more languages etc.

      All I want is to be able to use the JAWS functionality I have now with 
JAWS 9 standard on Vista Ultimate.

      I'd love to discuss this so please all send your comments.

      Peter

Other related posts: