[jewel] Re: Current state of Jewel-OBJC
- From: MJ Ray <markj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jewel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:28:49 -0000
frank.hale@xxxxxxxxxxx <frank.hale@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...] The syntax is absolutely revolting. [...]
People who complain about syntax normally haven't given the language
much of a look. ObjC's syntax for the OO bits is fairly close to
CLOS or Smalltalk, which are two OO systems far more respected and
aged than C++ or Java.
IMO, the new jewel's strengths will be a clean object model and
extensibility in almost any language. Brett has his own ideas, but
he's a fiendish coder, so I hope they're on having a fiendishly
clever core. ;-)
--
MJR
Other related posts:
