[iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: jb <jwb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: iyonix-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:46:24 +0100
Hi Peter
In message <44CC0F7D.6070300@xxxxxxx>
James Byrne <jbyrne@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Peter Bell wrote:
> > My Iyo has been running perfectly well for over three and a half years.
> >
> > In the last week, the ethernet interface has been failing to start up
> > properly in the morning when I power the machine up - no lights on the
> > switch (a Netgear Gigabit device), and no connectivity (mail fetch or
> > ping).
> >
> > I get the following from EKInfo when the system is in this state:
> >
> > : *ekinfo
> > : EtherK device driver for Intel PRO/1000 network controllers, version 0.19
> > : DCI Version 4.05
> > : Supported network cards detected: 1
> > :
> > : Unit 0 (location: Motherboard)
> > : Ethernet address 00:09:95:00:11:00
> > : Link is up; 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
is your switch a gigabit one?
> > : Controller mode: Multicast, reject frames with errors
> > :
> > : Frame types claimed:
> > : Ethernet 0800 (multicast) handler=(FC2E6610,FB407414)
> > : Ethernet 0806 (normal) handler=(FC2E6610,FB407414)
> > : Ethernet 8035 (normal) handler=(FC2E6610,FB407414)
> > :
> > : Hardware statistics summary:
> > : TX frames 169 : RX frames 302
> > : TX bytes 19,088 : RX bytes 44,649
> > : TX errors 0 : RX errors 0
> > :
> > : Driver statistics (only non-zero statistics are reported):
> > : Frames received: 302
> > : Unwanted frames: 27
> >
> > I'm puzzled at the hardware statistics, showing both TX and RX activity,
> > when I appear to have no connectivity.
> >
> > A *rmreinit etherk gets everything up and running.
what speed does that then show?
and also, as James asked, what effect does resetting the switch or
disconnecting/reconnecting the network cable have?
> >
> > Is this a sign of the psu starting to go out of spec?
I also think unlikely.. but a quick check of the psu with a dmm might
be illuminationg .. basically a 5v rail (red to black on a spare hdd
connector) which shows less than 5.04v would suggest a power supply
that is no longer behaving as it did when shipped.
John
>
> Unlikely, the symptom you get in that case is that EtherK fails to
> detect the Ethernet chip on the motherboard, which is not happening in
> this case.
>
> > or...
> >
> > Is it a sign of a problem with the switch? Although all other
> > ports appear to be working okay, perhaps I should try rebooting that
> > next time.
>
> Yes, probably a good idea to try resetting the switch. The EtherK output
> in your mail shows that as far as EtherK is concerned everything is OK.
> The link is up, it's been detected as 1000BaseT, and the driver is
> transmitting and receiving packets with no errors.
>
> As well as resetting the switch, I'd suggest swapping the Ethernet cable
> in case it's faulty - sometimes it's the simple things that go wrong. If
> you're convinced that the switch and cable are OK, try "*EKInfo -v" and
> look at some of the more obscure statistics to see if they give any
> hints of something amiss - the EtherK user guide file (which should be
> somewhere on your hard disc) explains what they mean (to an extent). If
> that doesn't get you anywhere, try forcing the link speed to 100M and
> see if that helps.
>
> James
> ---
> To alter your preferences or leave the group,
> visit http://www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
> Other info via http://www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
> --
> This email has been verified as Virus free
> Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net
--
John Ballance
jwb@xxxxxxxxxx
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit http://www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
Other info via http://www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
- Follow-Ups:
- [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: Peter Bell
- References:
- [iyonix-support] EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: Peter Bell
- [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: James Byrne
Other related posts:
- » [iyonix-support] EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- » [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: Peter Bell
- [iyonix-support] EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: Peter Bell
- [iyonix-support] Re: EtherK not starting up reliably
- From: James Byrne