I posted that days ago but it never made it to the list. Listweirdness happening for me! :( -----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Han Valk Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2008 7:49 PM To: ISAPros Mailing List Subject: [isapros] Re: Hyper-V is so damn kewl... ESX does _not_ run on top of Linux! The current 3.x product use a customized version of Red Hed Enterprise Linux as a special VM that runs on the VMkernel (=hypervisor). ESXi 3.5 does not need this special VM anymore. ESX 4 and above will not have it in any edition. ________________________________ From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jerry Young Sent: Mon 5/12/2008 4:21 PM To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Hyper-V is so damn kewl... I thought Hyper-V was part of Server 2008. I know ESX runs on top of Linux. Perhaps my definition of "hardware-based virtualization" is different. The Unisys ES7000 is one platform which I consider "hardware-based virtualization". The Egenera BladeFrames and Blades are another. The prior uses Server Sentinal (IIRC) to manage the hardware, and the latter PAN Manager and vBlade Software. Once the virtual hardware boxes are configured, though, my understanding is that the passing of architecture is more like that which you get from a BIOS rather than software that sits on a OS stack to which API calls are made - if that makes any sense; there's no 'host' OS in the equation. I had thought Hyper-V was hosted on Server 2008 and I know ESX is hosted on Linux. I guess, I've never considered any kind of 'OS host'-based virtualization as 'hardware-based' virtualization. On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Jim Harrison <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hyper-V is hardware-based (e.g., uses the hardware virtualization). As of SP1, Virtual Server R2 adds "hardware-assisted" virtualization. AFAIK, the only VMWare product that dies this is ESX... -----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Young Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:36 AM To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Hyper-V is so damn kewl... Which are you implying is hardware-based virtualization? Or were you just "saying"? :) Egenera looks pretty good for hardware-based virtualization, though. The client I'm working at currently will probably be setting up a couple of chassis sometime in the near future. Should be interesting. -- Cordially yours, Jerry G. Young II On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Jim Harrison <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Regardless of the source, hardware-based virtualization outperforms software-based virtualization hands down. In the grand scheme of things, this point will be second only to the "religion" motivating customers toward one virtualization technology or another. SCVMM is intended to be the management tool of choice; that's why they're building it. RC1 should hit the streets soon; it'll be well worth the time to grab & install it. Jim -----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Mulholland Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 2:53 PM To: ISAPros Mailing List Subject: [isapros] Re: Hyper-V is so damn kewl... I was most unimpressed by the hyperv management console. The system center/virtual machine manager was the only way I would ever use it, but you need to be using multiple servers to warrant that, but given that the vmm was built on powershell it would be a good thing to drive from the cli if you are so inclined. That and running (read) managing HV on SC was near impossible unless you had rsat or another hyperv machine you could connect to the console (which wasn't available at the time). You were supposed to be able to use wmi to drive it but I was told that MS hadn't finished the docco on that. It might be great when they finish it. Vmware beta2 has some nice things about it and you can use the ESX client to manage it. Having used ESX and Virtual Iron in production I would say they have a way to go but I'm keen to setup an environment at work. We have 60 or so standalone vm boxes that dev and qa use and we are looking at using something to consolidate them, hyperv seems like it will fit the bill there. Greg -----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Harrison Sent: Sunday, 11 May 2008 5:24 AM To: ISAPros Mailing List Subject: [isapros] Hyper-V is so damn kewl... Got my ISA 2006 server running on Hyper-V now. I'll soon migrate to TMG (probably not today; gardening awaits). -- Cordially yours, Jerry G. Young II Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer