[isapros] Re: Hyper-V is so damn kewl...
- From: "Jerry Young" <jerrygyoungii@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 08:36:11 -0400
Which are you implying is hardware-based virtualization? Or were you just
"saying"? :)
Egenera looks pretty good for hardware-based virtualization, though. The
client I'm working at currently will probably be setting up a couple of
chassis sometime in the near future. Should be interesting.
--
Cordially yours,
Jerry G. Young II
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Jim Harrison <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Regardless of the source, hardware-based virtualization outperforms
> software-based virtualization hands down. In the grand scheme of things,
> this point will be second only to the "religion" motivating customers toward
> one virtualization technology or another.
>
> SCVMM is intended to be the management tool of choice; that's why they're
> building it.
> RC1 should hit the streets soon; it'll be well worth the time to grab &
> install it.
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Greg Mulholland
> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 2:53 PM
> To: ISAPros Mailing List
> Subject: [isapros] Re: Hyper-V is so damn kewl...
>
> I was most unimpressed by the hyperv management console. The system
> center/virtual machine manager was the only way I would ever use it, but you
> need to be using multiple servers to warrant that, but given that the vmm
> was built on powershell it would be a good thing to drive from the cli if
> you are so inclined. That and running (read) managing HV on SC was near
> impossible unless you had rsat or another hyperv machine you could connect
> to the console (which wasn't available at the time). You were supposed to be
> able to use wmi to drive it but I was told that MS hadn't finished the docco
> on that. It might be great when they finish it.
>
> Vmware beta2 has some nice things about it and you can use the ESX client
> to manage it. Having used ESX and Virtual Iron in production I would say
> they have a way to go but I'm keen to setup an environment at work. We have
> 60 or so standalone vm boxes that dev and qa use and we are looking at using
> something to consolidate them, hyperv seems like it will fit the bill there.
>
> Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
> Sent: Sunday, 11 May 2008 5:24 AM
> To: ISAPros Mailing List
> Subject: [isapros] Hyper-V is so damn kewl...
>
> Got my ISA 2006 server running on Hyper-V now.
> I'll soon migrate to TMG (probably not today; gardening awaits).
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
