In message <f1d929334f.ralph_valmai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ralph_valmai@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I think my judgement is/was affected by my view that a displayed > equation should be part of a properly punctuated sentence. It is > sometimes the end of a sentence and should have a full stop, and > sometimes not, when it might have a comma or whatever following it. In > the latter case the sentence might continue with 'where x is . . .'. > The displayed equation is not often a paragraph on its own; it is > usually part of a longer paragraph. Therefore I was surprised to find > that the shift carriage return had no effect. I think there is a misunderstanding. The question whether an equation is a paragraph on its own or part of a sentence is precisely the distinction between an Equation and an inline Expression in TechWriter. If you want it to be part of a sentence, why not use an Expression? Then, you can have line breaks and everything. The main reason for having Equations is the fact that an Equation can have an equation number to the left or right, which you could not easily achieve with an inline Expression. Maybe you mix this up with the distinction between the sizes? By default, Equations are shown at Display size (e.g., limits are above operators) and inline Expressions at Text size (limits to the side of operators), but you can change that for the full expression or even individual parts in Maths => Size, so you can have an inline Expression shown in the same way as a standalone Equation and vice versa. Martin -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Wuerthner MW Software lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to //www.freelists.org/list/icon-users ------------------------------------------------------------