> Since BONE is obviously vastly superior, and largely (completely?) > backwards > compatible, it seems silly to implement the (rather lacking) r5 stack > when > there is the foundation for something much better. That networking isn't as good as it could in R5 doesn't have anything to do with the fact that there is a net_server. If the net_server would be reimplemented, there would be no need to include all its bugs with it. Anyway, the network team is preparing a kernel-level stack, similar to BONE, to avoid the context-switch overhead (which can be huge for networking stacks [lots of very small packets]). Adios... Axel.