Le Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:27:04 +0200, PulkoMandy a écrit : > Le Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:15:40 +0200, Lucian Adrian Grijincu > <lucian.grijincu@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit: > > > I see it like ndiswrapper was for Linux a few years ago, and for > > some > > cards still is: we can have the functionality here and now. We > > benefit > > from having happier users (which might or might not turn into > > developers) and from having time to work on more important tasks. > > Eventually, as the development team grows, if it is seen necessary, > > such external dependencies can be shed in favor of internally > > developed ones. > > Mh... Haiku being a BSD-Licensed project, I don't think it's a good > idea > to include the linux kernel as a 'core' component, knowing it's > GPLed. The > project may be nice as a thing external to haiku, adding extra > functionnality (I personally doesn't thing it's a clean way to do it > and I > know some people are worried by Qt being available on haiku, for > example). > But I don't think you can expect it to be a GSoC project with full > support > from Haiku. That's my personal opinion, of course other mentors may > think > otherwise. I'd rather see drivers for existing virtualization solution (some people started working on VirtualBox Guest additions, but what about Xen ?) to allow serving Haiku desktops to thin clients :P François.