> On 07/04/2009, James Bell wrote: > > but they did used to > > ask what format you wanted the disc in: HFS+ or FAT32. This had the > > aggrevating side effect that if you owned an OS X box and a Windows > > box, you couldn't sync your iPod to both without reformatting the > > iPod > > partition (another reason to ditch the device). > > Uh. I've been able to sync my FAT32-formatted 4G iPod to both for > years now. I believe this limitation was lifted when the Shuffle was > introduced, or even before. Ok. > As for the DB, it's not encrypted, but crypto-hash-signed in the > newer > models to detect corruption. So the hashing algo had to be broken in Ah yes, I wasn't sure. To "detect corruption" ? ROTFL worst excuse ever. checksum or md5sum is way enough for this. > order for 3rd party apps to write to the DB, which Apple felt was > done > in violation to the DMCA or something. Meaning that (as long as no > similar bill passes there) European citizens can just ignore the > noise > and sync their iPods to any alternative music manager they see fit. Or just stop supporting such evil company and buy a more open one :) François.