On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:24 PM, François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> I read that iPods use a FAT32 file system on Windows and a HFS+ file >> system on Mac. > > Not exactly. > > It's not possible to use 2 different fs at once for r/w, unless they > are faked... (for read only mkisofs can make an hybrid iso/hfs..) > > IIRC old iPods use a FAT with a custom registry-like databased in files > inside it for metadata. > IIRC newer iPods now encrypt this database to make sure only iTunes can > use it (which equivalent to tied sale and should be forbidden in France > btw :p). Just as an iPod user from the past: I'm not sure this is strictly true. I haven't owned an iPod for a few generations now (hard drives kept dying on me), but they did used to ask what format you wanted the disc in: HFS+ or FAT32. This had the aggrevating side effect that if you owned an OS X box and a Windows box, you couldn't sync your iPod to both without reformatting the iPod partition (another reason to ditch the device). The flat-file database for metadata does exist, and is the same format as the flat-file db used for iTunes. It is intensely verbose, contains all your music in a single place (making incremental changes take a while to perform for file searching) and prone to corruption. I did a quick websearch, but couldn't find the standard locations for this on either operating systems, but I haven't much time at the moment to check it out. James -- Make a man a fire and he'll be warm for the night. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.