On 2009-08-27 at 09:33:03 [+0200], scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Stephan Assmus<superstippi@xxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > On 2009-08-27 at 03:31:06 [+0200], Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Pete > >> > >> > I guess all one really needs to make sure is erased is the previous > >> > system hierarchy (which is what I did this time, and it seems OK). > >> > >> Yes the system should be mostly self-contained in there. Maybe you > >> want to wipe-update common and develop as well. What you want to keep > >> usually resides in home, which can mostly be left as is. > >> > >> > Maybe the Installer could do that (warning the user first), as > >> > update-installs are likely to be fairly frequent with Haiku for a > >> > while! > >> > >> There was a discussion about that once. Not sure about the exact > >> outcome, but wipeing system is always safe (as the user is not > >> supposed to mess with it and if he does he's at fault; of course it'd > >> still be documented), wiping common and develop could be done after > >> asking IMO. > > > > Hm. I really thought I implemented wiping the /system. And even tested > > that... I need to check, this is supposed to work. > > > > Best regards, > > -Stephan > > > > > > If you made that change since May, then it may just be that Pete was > using the older Installer that was on the system. And if you did make > the fix, then his next update should be smoother. Ah, of course, that explains things. Thanks, Scott! Best regards, -Stephan