-- Axel Dörfler, on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:03:11 +0100: > 1) should we keep the existing Audio:* attributes around, or should > we > replace them where appropriate? > 2) should we use the MIME super type name (like Audio:) as a prefix, > and META: for everything that is not media related? Or should we have > a > Media: prefix for everything that is media related, and covers both, > audio and video? 2) Replace 'em, I'd say. In general, there are a few BeOS legacies that IMO should be corrected rather sooner than later. This could possibly break a few old BeOS apps and scripts, but binary compatibilty is way less important now that 5 years ago. By waiting any longer, even more apps will break as more new applications arrive. So, MEDIA:* for audio/video, META:* for use with unspecific files. Q: Would "rating" be META or MEDIA? It makes sense for images/*, audio/*, video/*, text/*. So these would be all "media". But maybe you want to rate application/x.vnd.Be-elfexecutable, i.e. applications, too? Hmmm. In the end, nothing prevents you from assigning any META/MEDIA/whatever attribute to anything, so the categories maybe don't have to be über-strict, allowing no exceptions. Right? Regards, Humdinger -- --=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=- Deutsche Haiku News @ http://www.haiku-gazette.de