On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Doug Philips <douglas.philips@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:18, Derrick Brashear <shadow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> one case isn't really enough to draw much from, statistically. > > It's better than zero... > >> still not really feeling the case for "no drink tickets". ignoring >> >> that, there seems to be no real consensus on >> either side appearing. so what's the tie-breaker? does it come down to >> executive decision at some point? >> how does the impasse get broken? > > I don't see how we can get consensus if we don't agree of if this is a > fundraiser or a PR event (see other thread). We're not starting from the > same set of assumptions. ("What do I, an attendee, get" vs. "how am I, an > attendee, helping HackPgh") well, that's a matter of how we bill the event. what's the level-set for it? -- Derrick