On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:18, Derrick Brashear <shadow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > one case isn't really enough to draw much from, statistically. > It's better than zero... still not really feeling the case for "no drink tickets". ignoring > that, there seems to be no real consensus on > either side appearing. so what's the tie-breaker? does it come down to > executive decision at some point? > how does the impasse get broken? > I don't see how we can get consensus if we don't agree of if this is a fundraiser or a PR event (see other thread). We're not starting from the same set of assumptions. ("What do I, an attendee, get" vs. "how am I, an attendee, helping HackPgh") -D