Yea, I think Doug mentioned about explaining some common pitfalls and how to resolve potential conflicts. Would this be a Friday night event? On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:16 PM, jeff kephart <n3glv1963@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > two could be interersting, esp if you had one making changes and > comits etc to a working git? showing the power of subversioning. > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Anthony Cascone <ajc317@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I wasn't actually asking you to do the talk, as much as asking if that > would > > seem of interest. I wouldn't mind talking about it for a bit. Perhaps > two > > people might be able to make it a little more interesting than just > talking > > about a how to use a particular tool. > > > > Perhaps we can talk about this more on Wednesday? > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Doug Philips <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >> On 3/16/13 4:04 PM, Anthony Cascone wrote: > >>> > >>> For the non-Git saavy, follow the link and hit the "ZIP" button. > >>> > >>> Which makes me wonder if we should have Git talk at some point. Doug, > >>> thoughts? > >> > >> > >> This has come up from time to time. Most recently at the last meeting > (or > >> two), so yes, we should do this. I'm a Mercurial user myself, so while > I can > >> talk to Distributed Version Control System (DVCS) concepts common to > git and > >> Mercurial, I cannot provide any practical git advice. > >> Based on spontaneous comments heard in the shop there are a number of > >> users of git, so hopefully someone will come forward to propose a Fri > night > >> talk. I'd love to do a 15 minute talk on DVCS in general, and then show > git > >> and Mercurial work-flows (including recovering from common oopsies). I > can > >> handle the Mercurial parts and would like to collaborate on the DVCS in > >> general part. > >> > >> -=Doug > >> P.S. Im' out of of pocket this weekend, but had a quick moment to check > >> emails. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >