two could be interersting, esp if you had one making changes and comits etc to a working git? showing the power of subversioning. On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Anthony Cascone <ajc317@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wasn't actually asking you to do the talk, as much as asking if that would > seem of interest. I wouldn't mind talking about it for a bit. Perhaps two > people might be able to make it a little more interesting than just talking > about a how to use a particular tool. > > Perhaps we can talk about this more on Wednesday? > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Doug Philips <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On 3/16/13 4:04 PM, Anthony Cascone wrote: >>> >>> For the non-Git saavy, follow the link and hit the "ZIP" button. >>> >>> Which makes me wonder if we should have Git talk at some point. Doug, >>> thoughts? >> >> >> This has come up from time to time. Most recently at the last meeting (or >> two), so yes, we should do this. I'm a Mercurial user myself, so while I can >> talk to Distributed Version Control System (DVCS) concepts common to git and >> Mercurial, I cannot provide any practical git advice. >> Based on spontaneous comments heard in the shop there are a number of >> users of git, so hopefully someone will come forward to propose a Fri night >> talk. I'd love to do a 15 minute talk on DVCS in general, and then show git >> and Mercurial work-flows (including recovering from common oopsies). I can >> handle the Mercurial parts and would like to collaborate on the DVCS in >> general part. >> >> -=Doug >> P.S. Im' out of of pocket this weekend, but had a quick moment to check >> emails. >> >> >> >> >