[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "GMPI list" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11


> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:06:28AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 02:59:21 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > > 2) Any changes needed to the "sample-rate at instantiation" req?  It
was
> > > argued for a bit, then silence.
> >
> > I dont think we reached consensus. I'm not sure wether that was just a
> > difference in nomenclature, or opinion.
>
> I changed it to:
>
> Plugins must not be expected to support dynamic sample rates. The sample
> rate must be set very early in the life of the plugin and not changed.
> Plugins can indicate non-support fo a sample rate by returning an error.

the samplerate should be provided with all informations regarding memory
allocation and initialization process, like number of audio in and audio
out.

VB


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: