[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:28:27 -0800
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 09:04:09PM +0100, Vincent Burel wrote:
> an other information "... well this kind of boring details that are usually
> bad implemented in C++ architecture where there is one function for each
> parameters, boring... and generating many potential troubles...
yes, let's avoid any ambiguity. On that you and I agree :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Vincent Burel
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Vincent Burel