[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:04:09 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:30 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:15:29PM +0100, Vincent Burel wrote:
> > > Plugins must not be expected to support dynamic sample rates. The
sample
> > > rate must be set very early in the life of the plugin and not changed.
> > > Plugins can indicate non-support fo a sample rate by returning an
error.
> >
> > the samplerate should be provided with all informations regarding memory
> > allocation and initialization process, like number of audio in and audio
> > out.
>
> There's not been a requirement that says audio-in and out is necessarily
> fixed...
well,
i meant that the samplerate, nb audio in and audio out (at least) are
information that need to be known together to make allocation and
initialization correctly. So i would prefer to get all this kind of
information in a single function in order to avoid ambigus cases , like :
"ok i recieve samplerate, but is the number of input defined or not ? can i
allocate my table or parameters stuct right now or should i have to wait for
an other information "... well this kind of boring details that are usually
bad implemented in C++ architecture where there is one function for each
parameters, boring... and generating many potential troubles...
VB
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- » [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Vincent Burel
- [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11
- From: Tim Hockin